Ruiz v. Goord
Opinion of the Court
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 in the nature of mandamus to compel the respondent Glenn S. Goord to eliminate the five-year term of post-release
Ordered that the respondents’ motion, in effect, to dismiss the proceeding is granted; and it is further,
Ordered that the petitioner’s cross motion is denied; and it is further,
Adjudged that the proceeding is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.
This Court does not have subject matter jurisdiction to entertain this proceeding (see CPLR 7804 [b]; 506 [b]; Matter of Nolan v Lungen, 61 NY2d 788, 790; Matter of New York State Rifle & Pistol Assn. v City of Mount Vernon, 148 AD2d 616, 618 [1989]). To the extent that the petition seeks a writ of prohibition against the respondent Randall Eng, a Justice of the Supreme Court, Queens County, the petition is purely hypothetical, as Justice Eng is not about to, nor has he threatened to, resentence the petitioner (see CPLR 7803 [2]). With respect to the respondent Glenn S. Goord, we note that a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 against that respondent must be brought in the Supreme Court (see CPLR 506). Crane, J.P., Krausman, Goldstein and Dillon, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.