Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007

Moody v. Sorokina

Moody v. Sorokina
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided February 2, 2007 · Pine
40 A.D.3d 22; 827 N.Y.S.2d 925

Counsel

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL, Svetlana Sorokina, appellant pro se., Scolaro, Shulman, Cohen, Fetter & Burstein, P.C., Syracuse (Shari R. Cohen of counsel), for respondent., Eugene J. Langone, Jr., Law Guardian, Watertown, for N.M.

Moody v. Sorokina

Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Pine, J.

Same opinion by Pine, J., as in Moody v Sorokina (40 AD3d 14 [2007]).

Scudder, P.J., Martoche and Centra, JJ., concur.

It is hereby ordered that said appeal be and the same hereby is unanimously dismissed without costs.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.