Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007

Belopolsky v. Renew Data Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided June 26, 2007

41 A.D.3d 322; 837 N.Y.S.2d 154

Cases that cite this one

18 later published cases cite this decision.

Wong v. Pragad (New York Supreme Court, Westchester County 2025)
Ramirez v. Issa (New York Supreme Court, New York County 2024)
Uptown Healthcare Management, Inc. v. Rivkin Radler LLP (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2014)
Uptown Healthcare Management, Inc. v. Rivkin Radler LLP (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2014)
Buchman v. 117 E. 72nd St. Corp. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2026)
Spring Scaffolding LLC v. Krall (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2025)
3B Assoc. LLC v. Ecommission Solutions, LLC (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2024)
Hasenzahl v. 44th St. Dev. LLC (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2022)
Pieternelle v. Smiley & Smiley, LLP (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2020)
JSC VTB Bank v. Mavlyanov (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2017)
Doronin v. Amanat (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2015)
SSA Holdings LLC v. Kaplan (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2014)
Oxbow Calcining USA Inc. v. American Industrial Partners (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2012)
Oxbow Calcining USA Inc. v. American Industrial Partners (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2012)
Fewer v. GFI Group Inc. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2009)
American International Group, Inc. v. Greenberg (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2009)
NAMA Holdings, LLC v. Greenberg Traurig, LLP (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2009)
Metropolitan Steel Industries, Inc. v. Tully Construction Co. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2008)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Ira Gammerman, J.H.O.), entered February 26, 2007, which stayed this action pending determination of the related case of Renaissance Technologies Corp. v Millennium Partners, L.P. (Index No. 03-603839), unanimously affirmed, without costs.

This is an action to recover damages for alleged mishandling of confidential software. Upon due consideration of the goals of judicial economy, orderly procedure and the prevention of inequitable results (see Asher v Abbott Labs., 307 AD2d 211 [2003]), we conclude that the court did not exercise its discretion improvidently by staying this action pending resolution of the previously commenced related action (cf. Pierre Assoc. v Citizens Cas. Co. of NY., 32 AD2d 495, 496 [1969]). Even though there was not a complete identity of parties, there were overlapping issues and common questions of law and fact (see Minton v Minton, 277 AD2d 103 [2000]; Goodridge v Fernandez, 121 *323AD2d 942, 945 [1986]), and “the determination of the prior action may dispose of or limit issues which are involved in the subsequent action” (Buzzell v Mills, 32 AD2d 897 [1969]). Concur—Sullivan, J.P., Buckley, Gonzalez, Sweeny and Kavanagh, JJ.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.