People ex rel. Woodard v. Burge
Opinion of the Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (O’Shea, J.), entered September 27, 2006 in Chemung County, which denied petitioner’s application for a writ of habeas corpus, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 70, without a hearing.
Petitioner was convicted in 1993 of the crimes of burglary in
Upon reviewing the instant application, petitioner has not presented any new facts or new legal grounds for granting habeas corpus relief (see People ex rel. Graham v Senkowski, 243 AD2d 979 [1997], lv denied 91 NY2d 808 [1998]). Therefore, Supreme Court properly denied the petition.
Peters, J.P., Mugglin, Rose, Lahtinen and Kane, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.
Although not at issue in the instant appeal, petitioner was convicted in 1994 of possession of burglar’s tools, which was also affirmed on appeal (People v Woodard, 234 AD2d 613 [1996], lv denied 89 NY2d 989 [1997], cert denied 520 US 1266 [1997]).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.