People v. Smith
Opinion of the Court
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Orange County (Berry, J.), rendered October 21, 2003, convicting him of rape in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing, of that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress his statement to a law enforcement officer.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant contends that the hearing court erred in failing to suppress a statement made by him to the police. However, the admission of the defendant’s statement at trial was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt, as it was largely exculpatory, and was duplicative of his earlier statements to police, which were properly introduced into evidence (see People v Benjamin, 257 AD2d 660, 661 [1999]). Further, considering that the defendant’s testimony was more inculpatory than the statement at issue, there is no reasonable possibility that the jury would have acquitted the defendant if his statement had not been introduced at trial (see People v Benjamin, supra; People v Curtis, 218 AD2d 667 [1995]).
The defendant’s contention that the People improperly
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.