Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007

In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a

In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided August 2, 2007
43 A.D.3d 550; 839 N.Y.S.2d 701
In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Respondent, who was admitted to practice by this Court in 1996, was suspended by this Court’s order dated July 2, 2003 for failure to comply with the attorney registration requirements of Judiciary Law § 468-a (307 AD2d 374 [2003]).

Respondent now requests reinstatement on the ground that he has complied with the attorney registration requirements of Judiciary Law § 468-a and the rules of the Chief Administrator of the Courts {see 22 NYCRR part 118). Petitioner does not object to respondent’s application.

Respondent’s application is granted and he is ordered reinstated, effective immediately.

Cardona, EJ., Mercure, Crew III, Peters and Spain, JJ., concur. Ordered that respondent’s application is granted; and it is further ordered that respondent is reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law in the State of New York, effective immediately.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.