Beamud v. Gray
Cases that cite this one
13 later published cases cite this decision.
- Sulaiman v. Thomas (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2008)
- Strassburg v. Merchants Auto. Group, Inc. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2022)
- Curl v. Schiffman (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2020)
- BUSH, DAWN v. KOVACEVIC, RICKI (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2016)
- Bush v. Kovacevic (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2016)
- Bush v. Kovacevic (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2016)
- Coutu v. Domingo (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2014)
- Garzon-Victoria v. Okolo (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2014)
- Garzon-Victoria v. Okolo (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2014)
- Perez-Hernandez v. M. Marte Auto Corp. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2013)
- Perez-Hernandez v. M. Marte Auto Corp. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2013)
- Gonzalez v. ARC Interior Construction (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2011)
- Rodriguez v. Moreno (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2010)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Milton A. Tingling, J.), entered January 23, 2007, which granted plaintiffs’ motion for partial summary judgment on the issue of liability, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Plaintiffs made a prima facie showing of their entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by demonstrating they were crossing the street, within the crosswalk, with the light in their favor, when they were struck by defendant’s vehicle, which was making a left turn (see Hoey v City of New York, 28 AD3d 717 [2006]; Zabusky v Cochran, 234 AD2d 542 [1996]). Defendant’s unsupported speculation as to plaintiffs’ alleged comparative negligence was insufficient to raise an issue of fact (see Jermin v APA Truck Leasing Co., 237 AD2d 255 [1997]). Concur—Lippman, P.J., Mazzarelli, Friedman, Marlow and Buckley, JJ.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.