Acosta v. Kelly
Opinion of the Court
The denial of petitioner’s application for a rifle/shotgun permit after revocation of his previous permit was not arbitrary or capricious. Neither the passage of six years nor his recent pursuit of a college education alters the fact that petitioner failed to comply with the rules on handgun licensing by entrusting his weapons to a gun shop in a nonremunerative “sale” rather than surrendering them to the precinct (see Matter of Acosta v Kelly, 7 AD3d 392 [2004], lv denied 3 NY3d 606 [2004]), which amounted to a misdemeanor (38 RCNY 5-26 [a]; Matter of Imberman v Kelly, 37 AD3d 186 [2007]). Concur—Tom, J.P., Saxe, Sullivan, Gonzalez and Sweeny, JJ.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.