In re Violeta P.
Cases that cite this one
2 later published cases cite this decision.
- In re John G. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2010)
- In re Darryl B. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2008)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
Order, Family Court, New York County (Sara P Schechter, J.), entered on or about November 30, 2004, which, after a fact-finding determination, terminated respondent mother’s rights
Permanent neglect may be found where a parent fails to acknowledge the problem that led to foster care placement in the first place (Matter of Alpacheta C., 41 AD3d 285 [2007]). Notwithstanding respondent’s completion of classes in parenting skills and anger management, and therapy sessions, there was clear and convincing evidence that she had failed to plan for her child’s future (see Social Services Law § 384-b [7]). The court was in the best position to make this evaluation (Matter of Taaliyah Simone S.D., 28 AD3d 371 [2006]). The determination as to the child’s best interests, in furtherance of finding her a permanent home, was supported by a preponderance of evidence highlighting the current positive environment of a foster mother who desires to adopt. Concur—Tom, J.P., Friedman, Gonzalez, Sweeny and Kavanagh, JJ.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.