Scivoli v. Levit
Opinion of the Court
In an action to recover damages for fraud, negligent misrepresentation, negligent supervision, and negligent hiring, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Jackson, J.), dated January 11, 2007, which denied his motion to dismiss the complaint pursuant to CFLR 3211 (a) (5) and (7).
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The defendant failed to establish the existence of a physician-patient relationship which would give rise to a medical malprac
Additionally, contrary to the defendant’s contention, the fact that the damages recoverable for fraud do not include emotional distress or pain and suffering does not justify dismissal of the complaint where there is some likelihood that the plaintiff may be able to establish at trial some pecuniary injury (see Jeffrey BB. v Cardinal McCloskey School & Home for Children, 257 AD2d 21, 24 [1999]).
The Supreme Court also properly determined that the plaintiffs complaint sufficiently set forth the elements of the causes of action sounding in fraud, negligent misrepresentation, negligent supervision, and negligent hiring.
The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Spolzino, J.P., Krausman, Carni and Dickerson, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.