People v. Flores
Opinion of the Court
Order,
The court correctly denied defendant’s motion since he was less than three years from his parole eligibility date when he filed the motion (see People v Bautista, 26 AD3d 230 [2006], appeal dismissed 7 NY3d 838 [2006]). Since defendant was clearly ineligible, as a matter of law, for resentencing, there was no reason for the court to assign counsel or conduct a hearing (see People v Santana, 44 AD3d 340 [2007]). Concur—Marlow, J.P, Nardelli, Williams and McGuire, JJ.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.