Cashel v. Cashel
Cases that cite this one
12 later published cases cite this decision.
- Matter of Legall v. Belle (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2020)
- Matter of Parris v. Wright (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2019)
- Matter of Cuccia-Terranova v. Terranova (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2019)
- Zubizarreta v. Hemminger (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2013)
- Zubizarreta v. Hemminger (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2013)
- Giannoulakis v. Kounalis (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2012)
- Giannoulakis v. Kounalis (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2012)
- Manzella v. Milano (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2011)
- Diaz v. Martinez (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2011)
- Sinnott-Turner v. Kolba (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2009)
- Lane v. Lane (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2009)
- Vasquez v. Medina (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2008)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the father appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Farneti, J.), dated January 18, 2007, which denied his cross motion, in effect, to prohibit contact between the parties’ child and the mother’s boyfriend Joseph Galante during the mother’s visitation.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The determination of visitation is within the sound discretion of the trial court based upon the best interests of the child, and its determination will not be set aside unless it lacks a sound and substantial basis in the record (see Matter of Kachelhofer v Wasiak, 10 AD3d 366 [2004]; Vinciguerra v Vinciguerra, 294 AD2d 565, 565-566 [2002]). In the instant case, the Supreme Court’s determination has a sound and substantial basis in the record. Schmidt, J.P., Skelos, Covello and Balkin, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.