People v. Williams
Cases that cite this one
2 later published cases cite this decision.
- People v. Estrella (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2011)
- People v. Nesbitt (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2010)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
Appeal by the defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Sullivan, J.), dated June 15, 2005, which, after a hearing pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C, designated him a level three sex offender.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the Supreme Court’s determination to designate him a level three sex offender is supported by clear and convincing evidence, and thus, should not be disturbed (see Correction Law § 168-n [3]; People v Morris, 33 AD3d 778 [2006]; People v Robert I., 33 AD3d 777 [2006]).
The defendant’s remaining contention, that he is entitled to a downward departure is unpreserved for appellate review (see People v Graham, 35 AD3d 299 [2006]) and, in any event, is without merit. Schmidt, J.P., Rivera, Florio and Balkin, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.