Montesinos v. Cote
Cases that cite this one
10 later published cases cite this decision.
- Angelastro v. Dyer (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2024)
- Reyes v. United States (District Court, S.D. New York 2021)
- Gonzalez v. O Tembelis Trans, Inc. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2020)
- Rincon v. Renaud (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2020)
- Persaud v. Hub Truck Rental Corp. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2019)
- Tavarez v. Herrasme (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2016)
- Price v. Tasber (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2016)
- Bonny v. Pierre (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2012)
- Saved v. Aviles (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2010)
- Abbas v. Salavel (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2010)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Murphy, J.), entered July 28, 2006, which, upon an order of the same court entered May 9, 2006, granting the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, dismissed the complaint.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.
The plaintiff Lisa Montesinos (hereinafter the injured plaintiff), allegedly sustained serious injuries when she attempted to exit her vehicle and the driver’s door of her car made contact with the trailer portion of a tractor-trailer owned by the defendant R & L Transfer and operated by the defendant Alan D. Cote, Jr. (hereinafter the defendants).
The evidence which the defendants submitted in support of their motion for summary judgment established their prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law (see Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., 68 NY2d 320 [1986]). The evidence established that the injured plaintiff violated Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1214 by opening the door on the side of her car adjacent to moving traffic when it was not reasonably safe to do so, and was negligent in failing to see what, by the reasonable use of her senses, she should have seen (see Williams v Persaud, 19 AD3d 686 [2005]). The evidence which the plaintiffs submitted in opposition to the motion failed to raise a triable issue of fact (see CPLR 3212 [b]). Miller, J.P., Crane, Dillon and Balkin, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.