People v. Mack
Opinion of the Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Wayne County Court (Stephen R. Sirkin, J.), rendered September 28, 2006. The judgment convicted defendant, upon a jury verdict, of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree (three counts) and criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree (two counts).
It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon a jury verdict of three counts of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree (Penal Law § 220.16 [1]) and two counts of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree (§ 220.39 [1]). Contrary to defendant’s contention, County Court did not err in refusing to suppress the cocaine found when police entered the residence of defendant’s girlfriend in order to arrest defendant. The record establishes that defendant’s girlfriend not only consented but requested that the police enter the residence, arrest defendant, and remove the cocaine (see People v Adams, 53 NY2d 1, 8 [1981], rearg
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.