Giordano v. Berisha
Opinion of the Court
The court initially denied plaintiffs motion for a default judgment and dismissed the complaint on the basis that the motion was not brought within one year after the individual defendant’s default (CPLR 3215 [c]). Upon reargument, the court determined that plaintiffs motion was in fact timely, but denied the motion on the ground that plaintiffs submissions were insufficient to support entry of a default judgment pursuant to CPLR 3215 (f). This determination was correct inasmuch as plaintiffs motion papers, in this action where he is seeking monies allegedly due under a contract the decedent was assigned for heating oil deliveries and services provided to three buildings, failed to include the underlying contract and assignment, and the assignor’s affidavit did not provide the particulars of the contract assigned to the decedent (see Feffer v Malpeso, 210 AD2d 60, 61 [1994]). However, under the circumstances presented, where plaintiff has actively pursued a resolution to the matter, plaintiff is granted leave to reapply for a default judgment, on proper papers, as indicated (Brown v Rosedale Nurseries, 259 AD2d 256, 257 [1999]). Concur—Lippman, P.J., Mazzarelli, Marlow, Catterson and Kavanagh, JJ.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.