People v. Sanford
Cases that cite this one
7 later published cases cite this decision.
- People v. Brown (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2018)
- VAILLANCOURT, BRUCE, PEOPLE v (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2013)
- People v. Vaillancourt (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2013)
- People v. Vaillancourt (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2013)
- People v. Guasp (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2012)
- People v. Ray (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2011)
- People v. Mangual (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2009)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Richard D. Carruthers, J.), entered on or about March 18, 2005, which adjudicated defendant a level three sex offender pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law art 6-C), unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The hearing court properly determined that although defendant received points relating to the facts of the underlying sex crime, the risk assessment instrument failed to adequately take into account the extreme and unusual brutality of that crime, which warranted an upward departure (see People v Ferrer, 35 AD3d 297 [2006], lv denied 8 NY3d 807 [2007]; People v Joslyn, 27 AD3d 1033 [2006]). The court considered defendant’s behavior following his release from prison and properly concluded that factor was outweighed by the circumstances of the crime. Concur—Lippman, P.J., Buckley, Gonzalez and Sweeny, JJ.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.