In re Marcus B.
Opinion of the Court
In ajuvenile delinquency proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 3,
Ordered that the order of disposition is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the presentment agency (see Matter of David H., 69 NY2d 792 [1987]), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the appellant’s identity as one of the perpetrators beyond a reasonable doubt (see Family Ct Act § 342.2 [2]). Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we find that the court’s findings of fact were not against the weight of the evidence (see Family Ct Act § 342.2 [2]; Matter of Shawn D., 40 AD3d 632 [2007]). Spolzino, J.P., Santucci, Angiolillo and Carni, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.