Levitin v. A.R.B. Management Services, Inc.
Cases that cite this one
2 later published cases cite this decision.
- Gurman v. Fotiades (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2011)
- In re Dior Polo G. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2010)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
In an action, inter alia, to recover
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying the plaintiffs motion for leave to renew because he failed to present “new facts not offered on the prior motion that would change the prior determination” (CPLR 2221 [e] [2]; see Williams v Nassau County Med. Ctr., 37 AD3d 594 [2007]). Spolzino, J.P., Santucci, Angiolillo and Carni, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.