Scaltro v. New York City Transit Authority
Scaltro v. New York City Transit Authority
49 A.D.3d 709; 852 N.Y.2d 844
Opinion of the Court
The defendant New York City Transit Authority made a prima facie showing of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law (see Trainer v City of New York, 41 AD3d 202 [2007]). In opposition, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact (see Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., 68 NY2d 320 [1986]). Fisher, J.P., Miller, McCarthy and Chambers, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.