Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008

People v. Lipscombe

People v. Lipscombe
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided March 18, 2008
49 A.D.3d 781; 854 N.Y.2d 452
People v. Lipscombe

Opinion of the Court

*782At the plea proceeding, the defendant was not advised that he would be subject to a period of post-release supervision as part of an enhanced sentence if he failed to comply with the conditions of his plea. After the defendant failed to appear on the scheduled sentencing date, the Supreme Court imposed the maximum sentence plus three years’ post-release supervision. As the People correctly concede, the failure to advise the defendant of post-release supervision at the time of his plea requires reversal of his conviction (see People v Louree, 8 NY3d 541 [2007]; People v Pagan, 43 AD3d 1086 [2007]). Spolzino, J.P., Skelos, Lifson and McCarthy, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.