People v. Fields
Opinion of the Court
Judgment,
Defendant failed to preserve his claim that he was not properly adjudicated a second violent felony offender, and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. As an alternative holding, we also reject it on the merits. In the circumstances presented (see People v Booker, 301 AD2d 477 [2003], lv denied 100 NY2d 592 [2003]) it is appropriate to consider defendant’s New Jersey indictment, which clearly establishes that his first-degree robbery conviction in that state was for the equivalent of a New York violent felony.
We perceive no basis for reducing the sentence. Concur— Lippman, P.J., Tom, Gonzalez and Buckley, JJ.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.