Faden v. Satterlee Stephens Burke & Burke, LLP
Opinion of the Court
In an action to
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The defendants were entitled to dismissal of the complaint based upon documentary evidence that conclusively established a defense to the action (see CPLR 3211 [a] [1]; Malarkey v Piel, 7 AD3d 681 [2004]). The defendants submitted a stockholders’ agreement signed by the plaintiff which conclusively disposed of his legal malpractice claim (see Bishop v Maurer, 33 AD3d 497, 499 [2006], affd 9 NY3d 910 [2007]; Beattie v Brown & Wood, 243 AD2d 395 [1997]; Lunney & Crocco v Wolfe, 243 AD2d 348 [1997]). Miller, J.P, Dillon, Balkin and Chambers, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.