Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008

People v. Rusielewicz

People v. Rusielewicz
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided December 9, 2008
57 A.D.3d 697; 868 N.Y.2d 535; 56 A.D.2d 693; 867 N.Y.S.2d 344
People v. Rusielewicz

Opinion of the Court

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see Anders v California, 386 US 738 [1967]; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631 [1976]; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606 [1979]).

*698The defendant has not, nor could he have, raised any nonfrivolous issues in his supplemental pro se brief. Fisher, J.E, Lifson, Covello, Balkin and Belen, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.