Rivera v. Fischer
Opinion of the Court
As an initial matter, we note that, contrary to petitioner’s assertion, Supreme Court properly transferred the proceeding to this Court inasmuch as the petition raises a question of substantial evidence (see Matter of Rodriguez v Goord, 40 AD3d 1324, 1325 [2007]). Turning to the merits, the misbehavior report, together with the testimony adduced at the hearing, provide substantial evidence to support the determination of guilt (see Matter of Wigfall v Goord, 53 AD3d 943, 943 [2008]). As for petitioner’s denial of the allegations against him, a credibility issue was created for resolution by the Hearing Officer (see Matter of Jordan v Fischer, 53 AD3d 1013 [2008]). To the extent preserved, petitioner’s remaining contentions, including his claim that he was denied a fair and impartial hearing, have been examined and found to be unavailing.
Peters, J.P., Spain, Carpinello, Malone Jr. and Kavanagh, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.