In re Jenkins
Opinion of the Court
Inasmuch as claimant left her position while continuing work was available without exploring other employment options with the employer, substantial evidence supports the Board’s decision that claimant left her job without good cause (see Matter of Oku [Commissioner of Labor], 1 AD3d 684 [2003]). Claimant’s testimony that she was removed from her position presented a credibility issue for the Board to resolve (see Matter of Dragoi [Commissioner of Labor], 288 AD2d 685, 686 [2001]). Therefore, we find no reason to disturb the Board’s decision.
Cardona, P.J., Peters, Carpinello, Kane and Kavanagh, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.