Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008

In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law

In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided November 20, 2008
56 A.D.2d 1043; 867 N.Y.S.2d 354
In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law

Opinion of the Court

— Per Curiam.

Respondent, who was admitted to practice by this Court in 1995, was suspended by this Court’s order dated January 6, 2005 for failure to comply with the attorney registration requirements of Judiciary Law § 468-a (14 AD3d 788 [2005]).

Respondent now requests reinstatement on the ground that he has complied with the attorney registration requirements of Judiciary Law § 468-a and the Rules of the Chief Administrator of the Courts (see 22 NYCRR part 118). Petitioner does not object to respondent’s application.

Respondent’s application is granted and he is ordered reinstated, effective immediately.

Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Peters, Spain and Carpinello, JJ., concur. Ordered that respondent’s application is granted; and it is further ordered that respondent is reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law in the State of New York, effective immediately.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.