Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008

Mead Home Improvement, Inc. v. Goldstein

Mead Home Improvement, Inc. v. Goldstein
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided November 14, 2008
56 A.D.2d 1179; 866 N.Y.S.2d 889
Mead Home Improvement, Inc. v. Goldstein

Opinion of the Court

— Appeal from an order of the Monroe County Court (Richard A. Keenan, J.), entered April 3, 2007. The order affirmed a judgment of the Rochester City Court (Teresa D. Johnson, J.), dated September 21, 2006 in favor of plaintiff in a small claims action.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from an order affirming City Court’s judgment in favor of plaintiff in this small claims action. Contrary to defendant’s contention, we conclude that “substantial justice has . . . been done between the parties according to the rules and principles of substantive law,” and thus we affirm (UJCA 1807; see generally Sten v Desrocher, 8 AD3d 915 [2004]; Coppola v Kandey Co., 236 AD2d 871 [1997]). Present — Martoche, J.P, Smith, Centra, Peradotto and Pine, JJ.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.