People v. Hogue
Opinion of the Court
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Charles H. Solomon, J.), entered on or about February 27, 2007, which denied defendant’s CPL 440.10 motion to vacate a judgment, same court and Justice, rendered on or about January 25, 2000, and denied his CPL 440.20 motion to set aside his sentence, unanimously modified, on the law, to the extent of vacating defendant’s sentence and remanding for resentencing, and otherwise affirmed.
Although defendant’s conviction required the imposition of a term of postrelease supervision (PRS), the court did not mention PRS during the plea allocution (see People v Catu, 4 NY3d 242 [2005]), and failed to impose any term of PRS at sentencing, either orally or otherwise (see People v Sparber, 10 NY3d 457 [2008]). However, defendant did not raise any issue relating to PRS on his direct appeal to this Court. Defendant was not
Nevertheless, defendant’s sentence is presently unlawful because it does not include a period of PRS. Concur—Friedman, J.P, Sweeny, McGuire, Renwick and Freedman, JJ.
Reargument granted and, upon reargument, the decision and order of this Court entered on December 23, 2008 (57 AD3d 390 [2008] ) recalled and vacated and a new decision and order substituted therefor.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.