People v. Thomas
Opinion of the Court
Judgments,
Defendant’s argument that his plea was rendered involuntary by the court’s failure to mention the mandatory surcharges and fees during the plea allocution is without merit (see People v Hoti, 12 NY3d 742 [2009]). Furthermore, the surcharges and fees were properly imposed (see People v Guerrero, 12 NY3d 45 [2009]).
Defendant’s excessive sentence claim is foreclosed by his valid waiver of his right to appeal. In any event, we perceive no basis to reduce the two-year term of postrelease supervision. Concur— Andrias, J.P., Saxe, Sweeny, Nardelli and Freedman, JJ.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.