In re Estate of Mormin
Opinion of the Court
In a probate proceeding, in which a judicial settlement was sought, Weitz & Luxenberg, EC., the current attorney for the parents of the deceased Kevin Jean Henri Faul Mormin appeals from a decree of the Surrogate’s Court, Suffolk County (Czygier, S.), entered January 28, 2008, which directed it to pay
Ordered that the decree is affirmed, with costs payable by Weitz & Luxenberg, EC.
Where an attorney is discharged without cause, the attorney may recover in quantum meruit the reasonable value of the services rendered (see Campagnola v Mulholland, Minion & Roe, 76 NY2d 38, 44 [1990]; Seth Rubenstein, P.C. v Ganea, 41 AD3d 54, 60 [2007]; Bruk v Albin, 270 AD2d 441, 442 [2000]). “The determination of what constitutes a reasonable attorney’s fee is left to the sound discretion of the surrogate, ‘who is in a far superior position to judge those factors integral to the fixing of counsel fees, such as the time, effort, and skill required’ ” (Matter of Tendler, 12 AD3d 520, 521 [2004], quoting Matter of Pekofsky v Estate of Cohen, 259 AD2d 702, 702 [1999]; see Clifford v Pierce, 214 AD2d 697, 698 [1995]).
Here, contrary to the appellant’s contention, the Surrogate’s Court providently exercised its discretion in fixing the fee of Stephen Civardi, P.C., at the sum of $58,777.82, which was 20% of the total attorney’s fee (see Clifford v Pierce, 214 AD2d at 698).
The appellant’s remaining contentions are either without merit or not properly before this Court. Fisher, J.P., Balkin, Hall and Austin, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.