Zimnoch v. Bridge View Palace, LLC

The appeal from the order dated March 23, 2007, must be *928dismissed because the right of direct appeal therefrom terminated with the entry of judgment in the action (see Matter of Aho, 39 NY2d 241, 248 [1976]). The issues raised on the appeal from that order are brought up for review and have been considered on the appeal from the judgment (see CPLR 5501 [a] [1]; Zimnoch v Bridge View Palace, LLC, 69 AD3d 928 [2010] [decided herewith]). Skelos, J.E, Dickerson, Lott and Roman, JJ., concur.