People v. Alvarado
Opinion of the Court
The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342, 348-349 [2007]). There is no basis for disturbing the court’s determinations concerning credibility and identification. Reliable evidence provided by police officers and a civilian witness established that defendant was the fleeing driver of a stolen car, and that he struck a police officer. The element of physical injury was properly established by the officer’s testimony as to the level of pain he felt (see People v Guidice, 83 NY2d 630, 636 [1994]). Defendant’s pattern of egregious conduct in this lengthy car chase supported the conclusion that he acted with the culpable mental state of depraved indifference to human life (see People v Feingold, 7 NY3d 288 [2006]; People v Mooney, 62 AD3d 725 [2009]). Concur—Tom, J.P., Sweeny, Catterson, Moskowitz and DeGrasse, JJ.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.