IDS Property Casualty Insurance v. Wynter
Opinion of the Court
The record establishes that, at the time of the accident respondent was a passenger in an uninsured motor vehicle. He and the driver of the vehicle, a fellow employee, were on their way to a store where the driver intended to carry out a personal errand unrelated to work. Since respondent and the driver were not acting within the scope of their employment, workers’ compensation, if it is a remedy, is not respondent’s exclusive remedy (see Workers’ Compensation Law § 29 [6]; Macchirole v Giamboi, 97 NY2d 147, 150 [2001]). Concur—Gonzalez, P.J., Andrias, Catterson, Renwick and Manzanet-Daniels, JJ.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.