Mitchell v. City of New York
Opinion of the Court
In a proceeding pursuant to General Municipal Law § 50-e (5) for leave to serve a late notice of claim, the petitioner appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Miller, J.), entered November 30, 2009, which denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying the petition for leave to serve a late notice of claim under the relevant facts and circumstances of this case. Initially, the petitioner failed to demonstrate a reasonable excuse for not serving a timely notice of claim. Furthermore, he failed to establish that the respondent received actual timely notice of the essential facts constituting his claim that the accident was caused by a defective guardrail (see Matter of Felice v Eastport/ South Manor Cent. School Dist., 50 AD3d 138, 147 [2008]; Matter of National Grange Mut. Ins. Co. v Town of Eastchester, 48 AD3d 467, 468 [2008]; Weber v County of Suffolk, 208 AD2d
Moreover, under the circumstances of this case, a late notice of claim would prejudice the respondent (see Williams v Nassau County Med. Ctr., 6 NY3d 531 [2006]). Dillon, J.P., Balkin, Chambers and Sgroi, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.