Tirado v. Koritz
Opinion of the Court
Appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Paula L. Feroleto, J.), entered June 30, 2009 in a medical malpractice action. The order directed plaintiffs to disclose various medical records.
It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously modified on the law by vacating the second ordering paragraph and that part of the third ordering paragraph directing plaintiffs to provide an authorization permitting the release of certain medical records, and by directing plaintiffs to
In view of the injuries alleged by plaintiffs, we conclude that Supreme Court properly exercised its discretion in directing plaintiffs to submit to the court for in camera review a certified complete copy of plaintiffs records from Sadiqa Karim, M.D., Quest Diagnostic and X-Cell Laboratories of WNY (see Tabone v Lee, 59 AD3d 1021, 1022 [2009]; Mayer v Cusyck, 284 AD2d 937 [2001]; Carter v Fantauzzo, 256 AD2d 1189, 1190 [1998]). “In bringing the action, plaintiff waived the physician[-]patient privilege only with respect to the physical and mental conditions affirmatively placed in controversy” (Mayer, 284 AD2d at 938). “That waiver, however, ‘does not permit wholesale discovery of information regarding [plaintiffs] physical and mental condition. The waiver of the physician-patient privilege made by a party who affirmatively asserts a physical condition in its pleading does not permit discovery of information involving unrelated illnesses and treatments’ ” (Carter, 256 AD2d at 1190).
The court abused its discretion, however, in directing plaintiffs to provide authorizations permitting the release of plaintiffs medical records from Daniel Leary, M.D. and Sadiqa Karim, M.D. that “are related to any condition(s) or disease(s) of the abdomen or pelvis, as well as [to] those [conditions or diseases] that are gynecological or obstetrical in nature.” The court, rather than those medical providers, is in the best position “to determine whether the records are material and related to any physical or mental condition placed in issue by plaintiffs” (Tabone, 59 AD3d at 1022). We therefore modify the order accordingly. The court properly directed plaintiffs to provide
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.