Bush v. Division of Human Rights
Opinion of the Court
The record shows that the Division conducted an appropriate and fair investigation, and that it had a rational basis for finding no probable cause to believe that petitioner’s housing application was rejected because of her race, sex, marital status, religion, or disability (see Matter of McFarland v New York State Div. of Human Rights, 241 AD2d 108, 111-112 [1998]; see also Gaskin v Westbourne Assoc., L.P., 59 AD3d 362 [2009]). Petitioner’s other requests for relief are not properly before this Court. Concur — Friedman, J.P., Sweeny, Catterson, Renwick and Román, JJ.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.