People v. Hamilton
Opinion of the Court
—Appeal by the de
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see Anders v California, 386 US 738 [1967]; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631 [1976]).
The defendant has not, nor could he have, raised any nonfrivolous issues in his supplemental pro se brief. Dillon, J.P., Angiolillo, Hall and Roman, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.