People v. Rodriguez
Opinion of the Court
—Appeal by the de
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The record establishes that the defendant knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently waived his right to appeal (see People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 256 [2006]; People v Seaberg, 74 NY2d 1, 11 [1989]). There was no effort to conceal error, and the defendant was made fully aware of any appealable issues (see People v Holman, 89 NY2d 876, 878 [1996]). Accordingly, the defendant’s waiver of the right to appeal, made as part of his sentencing agreement after a jury verdict of guilty, was valid and precludes review of the issues raised on appeal (see People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248 [2006]; People v Holman, 89 NY2d 876 [1996]; People v Seaberg, 74 NY2d 1 [1989]). Skelos, J.P., Balkin, Eng and Austin, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.