Towne Partners, LLC v. RJZM, LLC
Opinion of the Court
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Marcy S. Friedman, J.), entered April 27, 2010, which granted plaintiffs motion for summary judgment and denied defendant’s motions for summary judgment and for leave to amend its answer, unanimously modified, on the facts and the law, to grant defendant’s motion for summary judgment in part on the issue of use and occupancy, and for leave to amend its answer to include the proposed counterclaim, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.
Defendant is not liable for the attorneys’ fees incurred by plaintiff. The settlement agreement specifically references only article 20 of the lease, which provided for liquidated damages. There is no provision in the stipulation requiring a deviation from the American rule, and we decline to read one into the stipulation (Hooper Assoc. v AGS Computers, 74 NY2d 487 [1989]).
Defendant established the viability of its proposed counterclaim for the payment of utility charges incurred by defendant after it surrendered the premises (see CPLR 3025 [b]). Accordingly, defendant is directed to serve an amended answer asserting the proposed counterclaim within 20 days after the entry of this order, after which the parties will have an opportunity to conduct discovery on the issue.
We have considered defendant’s remaining arguments and find them unavailing. Concur — Gonzalez, EJ., Catterson, Acosta and Manzanet-Daniels, JJ.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.