Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011

CUNNINGHAM, III, EDWARD v. LECHASE CONSTRUCTION

CUNNINGHAM, III, EDWARD v. LECHASE CONSTRUCTION
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided December 23, 2011
CUNNINGHAM, III, EDWARD v. LECHASE CONSTRUCTION

Opinion

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department 1078 CA 11-00958 PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., SMITH, CENTRA, GREEN, AND GORSKI, JJ.

EDWARD CUNNINGHAM, III, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, V ORDER LECHASE CONSTRUCTION, FREDERICO WRECKING CO., INC., AND FRIENDS OF FINGER LAKES PERFORMING ARTS CENTER, INC., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS. -------------------------------------------- FREDERICO WRECKING CO., INC., THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, V CONTOUR ERECTION AND SIDING SYSTEMS, INC., THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. -------------------------------------------- LECHASE CONSTRUCTION SERVICES, LLC AND FRIENDS OF FINGER LAKES PERFORMING ARTS CENTER, INC., THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, V CONTOUR ERECTION AND SIDING SYSTEMS, INC., THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

MAXWELL MURPHY, LLC, BUFFALO (ALAN D. VOOS OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT.

BROWN & TARANTINO, LLC, BUFFALO (ANN M. CAMPBELL OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS AND THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS.

MACKENZIE HUGHES LLP, SYRACUSE (JENNIFER P. WILLIAMS OF COUNSEL), FOR THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (John A.

Michalek, J.), entered November 24, 2010 in a personal injury action.

The order, inter alia, denied the motion of plaintiff for partial summary judgment on liability pursuant to Labor Law § 240 (1), granted those parts of the motions of defendants-third-party plaintiffs and third-party defendant seeking summary judgment dismissing the complaint, and granted that part of the motion of third-party defendant seeking summary judgment dismissing the third-party -2- 1078 CA 11-00958 complaints.

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously modified on the law by denying those parts of the motions of defendants-third-party plaintiffs and third-party defendant seeking summary judgment dismissing the Labor Law § 240 (1) claim and the Labor Law § 241 (6) claim to the extent that it is premised on a violation of 12 NYCRR 23-3.3 (h), reinstating those claims and denying that part of the motion of third-party defendant seeking summary judgment dismissing the third-party complaints and reinstating the third-party complaints, and as modified the order is affirmed without costs (see Charney v LeChase Constr., ___ AD3d ___ [Dec. 23, 2011]).

Entered: December 23, 2011 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.