Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011

CURTO, PATRICIA J. v. DIEHL, MARK

CURTO, PATRICIA J. v. DIEHL, MARK
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided September 30, 2011
CURTO, PATRICIA J. v. DIEHL, MARK

Opinion

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department 1003 CA 10-02024 PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., SMITH, LINDLEY, SCONIERS, AND GORSKI, JJ.

PATRICIA J. CURTO, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER MARK DIEHL AND MELISSA SCHMIGEL, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS. (APPEAL NO. 1.)

PATRICIA J. CURTO, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT PRO SE.

HAGELIN KENT LLC, BUFFALO (VICTOR M. WRIGHT OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (James H.

Dillon, J.), dated December 17, 2009. The order granted the motion of defendants to vacate a default judgment and ordered plaintiff to provide discovery.

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: We reject the contention of plaintiff that Supreme Court erred in granting that part of defendants’ motion to vacate a default judgment. Inasmuch as defendants had previously appeared in this action, they were entitled to receive notice of plaintiff’s motion for a default judgment (see CPLR 3215 [g] [1]; Nowak v Oklahoma League for the Blind, 289 AD2d 995). Plaintiff failed to provide defendants with such notice, and thus her motion for a default judgment was defective. We have reviewed plaintiff’s remaining contentions and conclude that they are without merit.

Entered: September 30, 2011 Patricia L. Morgan Clerk of the Court

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.