People v. Estela
People v. Estela
80 A.D.3d 526; 914 N.Y.S.2d 893
Opinion of the Court
— Order, Supreme
The court considered the appropriate factors and properly exercised its discretion in denying resentencing. Given defendant’s extensive criminal record, the serious infraction he committed while incarcerated and his history of absconding, the court properly concluded that substantial justice dictated denial of the motion (see e.g. People v Hidalgo, 47 AD3d 455 [2008]). Concur — Saxe, J.P., Moskowitz, Richter, Manzanet-Daniels and Román, JJ.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.