People v. Rosario
Opinion of the Court
— Appeals by the
Ordered that the judgment and the resentence are affirmed.
The defendant’s only contentions on these appeals, that the sentence and resentence were excessive, are without merit (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]). Since the defendant pleaded guilty with the understanding that he would receive the sentence which was thereafter actually imposed, he has no basis now to complain that the sentence and resentence were excessive (see People v Hidalgo, 120 AD2d 675 [1986]; People v Kazepis, 101 AD2d 816 [1984]). Mastro, J.P., Chambers, Roman and Cohen, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.