Colon v. Shlo-Yank Holding, Ltd.
Opinion of the Court
The imposition of sanctions was warranted in light of the “frivolous conduct” engaged in by defendants’ counsel in connection with this action (22 NYCRR 130-1.1 [a], [c]). The record demonstrates that counsel blatantly disregarded the court’s preclusion ruling and advanced meritless arguments during trial and her summation (see Matter of Rachel’s Trousseau [Warshaw Woolen Assoc.], 249 AD2d 148 [1998], lv denied 92 NY2d 810 [1998]). Concur—Sweeny, J.P., Moskowitz, DeGrasse, Freedman and Richter, JJ.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.