People v. Elshabazz
Cases that cite this one
15 later published cases cite this decision.
- JOHNSON, ANDREW, PEOPLE v (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2013)
- People v. Johnson (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2013)
- People v. Johnson (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2013)
- JONES, DERRELL M., PEOPLE v (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2012)
- ADAMS, ANTHONY N., PEOPLE v (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2012)
- People v. Adams (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2012)
- People v. Jones (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2012)
- People v. Jones (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2012)
- FAREWELL, JR., JUDD A., PEOPLE v (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2011)
- LYONS, JAMEL, PEOPLE v (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2011)
- BURYTA, BRANDON, PEOPLE v (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2011)
- People v. Elshabazz (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2011)
- People v. Lyons (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2011)
- People v. Farewell (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2011)
- People v. Buryta (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2011)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Erie County (M. William Boiler, A.J.), rendered August 27, 2009. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of attempted criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree.
It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum: Defendant appeals from two judgments convicting him, respectively, upon his plea of guilty of attempted criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree (Penal Law §§ 110.00, 265.03 [3]) and upon his plea of guilty of criminal possession of marihuana in the fourth degree (§ 221.15). Contrary to the contention of defendant in each appeal, his waiver of the right to appeal was knowingly, voluntarily and intelligently entered (see People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 256 [2006]; People v Callahan, 80 NY2d 273, 280 [1992]). The valid waiver of the right to appeal encompasses defendant’s contention concerning the denial of his request for youthful offender status (see People v Harris, 77 AD3d 1326 [2010]; People v Williams, 37 AD3d 1193 [2007]). In any event, that contention is without merit. “Supreme Court carefully considered the request to be considered a youthful offender and stated the reasons for its denial” (Williams, 37 AD3d at 1194), and it cannot be said that the court abused its discretion in denying that request (see id.;
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.