Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011

M.N. Dental Diagnostics, P.C. v. New York City Transit Authority

M.N. Dental Diagnostics, P.C. v. New York City Transit Authority
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided March 1, 2011
82 A.D.3d 409; 917 N.Y.2d 856
M.N. Dental Diagnostics, P.C. v. New York City Transit Authority

Cases that cite this one

4 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

*410It is well settled that “the No-Fault Law does not codify common-law principles; it creates new and independent statutory rights and obligations in order to provide a more efficient means for adjusting financial responsibilities arising out of automobile accidents” (Aetna Life & Cas. Co. v Nelson, 67 NY2d 169, 175 [1986]). Since it is undisputed that there existed no contract between plaintiff’s assignor and the New York City Transit Authority, the common carrier’s obligation to provide no-fault benefits arises out of the no-fault statute. Therefore, the three-year statute of limitations as set forth in CPLR 214 (2) is applicable here. Concur — Gonzalez, P.J., Tom, Andrias, Renwick and Abdus-Salaam, JJ.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.