ADHY Advisors LLC v. 530 West 152nd Street LLC
Cases that cite this one
10 later published cases cite this decision.
- Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. 24 W. 57 APF LLC (New York Supreme Court, New York County 2024)
- SIG CRE 2023 Venture LLC v. Elizabeth Blue NYC, LLC (New York Supreme Court, New York County 2024)
- CI Notes LLC v. 7th Realty Holdings, LLC (New York Supreme Court, New York County 2024)
- SIG CRE 2023 Venture LLC v. 126 Retail, LLC (New York Supreme Court, New York County 2024)
- Wilmington Savings Fund Socy., FSB v. Mallikarjun (New York Supreme Court, New York County 2024)
- US Bank, N.A. v. Rufai (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2022)
- HSBC Bank USA, N.A. v. Rubin (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2022)
- Shaw Funding, LP v. Bennett (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2020)
- Nechadim Corp. v. Simmons (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2019)
- Bank of Am., N.A. v. Schoharie Senior Hous. Dev. Fund Corp. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2018)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
Although the mortgage agreement at issue contains a provision which specifically authorizes the appointment of a receiver upon application by the mortgagee in any action to foreclose (see Real Property Law § 254 [10]), it is well settled that “[a]n action to foreclose a mortgage is an action in equity” (Jamaica Sav. Bank v M. S. Inv. Co., 274 NY 215, 219 [1937]). Thus, a court of equity, in its discretion and under appropriate circumstances, may deny such an application (see Maspeth Fed. Sav. & Loan Assn. v McGown, 77 AD3d 889, 889-890 [2010]; Clinton Capital Corp. v One Tiffany Place Developers, 112 AD2d 911, 912 [1985]; Mancuso v Kambourelis, 72 AD2d 636, 637 [1979], appeal dismissed 48 NY2d 1027 [1980]; W. I. M. Corp. v Cipulo, 216 App Div 46 [1926]). Based upon the circumstances presented here, we find that the motion court properly exercised its discretion in declining to appoint a receiver. Concur — Mazzarelli, J.E, Saxe, Friedman, Acosta and Freedman, JJ.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.