Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011

Mizuno v. Fischoff & Associates

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided March 8, 2011

82 A.D.3d 849; 918 N.Y.2d 363

Cases that cite this one

4 later published cases cite this decision.

Mizuno v. Nunberg (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2014)
Mizuno v. Barak (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2014)
Mizuno v. Barak (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2014)
DiTondo v. Meagher (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2011)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

*850As a result of the defendants’ legal malpractice, which is not contested on this appeal, the plaintiffs house was sold at a foreclosure sale on April 4, 2002. The plaintiff and his wife held title to the subject property as tenants by the entirety and were, thus, each seized of the whole property (see Kahn v Kahn, 43 NY2d 203, 206-207 [1977]; Stelz v Shreck, 128 NY 263, 266 [1891]; Paterno v CYC, LLC, 46 AD3d 788, 789 [2007]). Since the plaintiff owned the entire property, the Supreme Court properly held that he was entitled to recover 100% of the lost equity in the property.

We agree with the plaintiffs contention that May 1, 2003, is not a “reasonable intermediate date” from which to calculate prejudgment interest (CPLR 5001 [b]). Instead, we find that April 4, 2002, is a “single reasonable intermediate date” (CPLR 5001 [b]) from which to calculate prejudgment interest on the damages awarded in this case. Accordingly, we remit the matter to the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, for a new calculation and award of prejudgment interest, and for the entry of an appropriate amended judgment. Angiolillo, J.P, Hall, Roman and Cohen, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.