People v. George
Opinion of the Court
The defendant was convicted, after a jury trial, of assault in the first degree in connection with a January 1, 2000, stabbing
Since the defendant had not yet been released from incarceration for the crime in question when she was resentenced, her resentencing to a term including the statutorily required period of postrelease supervision did not subject her to double jeopardy or violate her right to due process of law (see People v Negron, 78 AD3d 1079, 1079-1080 [2010]; People v Misla, 78 AD3d 735 [2010]; People v Ragbirsingh, 78 AD3d 738 [2010]; People v Ware, 78 AD3d 743, 744 [2010]; People v Pruitt, 74 AD3d 1366, 1367 [2010]; People v Tillman, 74 AD3d 1251 [2010]; People v Mendez, 73 AD3d 951 [2010]; People v Murrell, 73 AD3d 598 [2010], lv granted 15 NY3d 854 [2010]; People v Parisi, 72 AD3d 989 [2010], lv granted 15 NY3d 776 [2010]; People v Becker, 72 AD3d 1290, 1291 [2010]; People v Scalercio, 71 AD3d 1060 [2010]; People v Prendergast, 71 AD3d 1055 [2010], lv granted 15 NY3d 808 [2010]; cf. People v Jordan, 15 NY3d 727, 728 [2010]; People v Williams, 14 NY3d 198 [2010], cert denied 562 US —, 131 S Ct 125 [2010]). Dillon, J.E, Dickerson, Hall and Roman, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.